Discover the power of personalized pain relief
Boston Scientific has helped thousands of people find lasting relief from pain—even when other therapies have failed.
Your pain is profoundly personal. It’s why we don’t take a one-size-fits-all approach. No two people feel pain in the same way. So it’s no surprise that the more we can personalize our solutions to your unique pain, the more likely you are to experience lasting pain relief.
Let’s find your relief. ⟶
Proven pain management solutions
Patient safety and comfort come first. You deserve to regain control of your life and find lasting relief with therapies that are clinically proven to be effective.
These Boston Scientific pain solutions are drug free and FDA approved:
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
SCS therapy uses an implanted device to deliver mild electrical impulses that interrupt pain signals your nerves send through your spinal cord. This can help prevent you from perceiving the pain.
Relieves chronic pain in:
- Lower back
- Legs
- Feet
of Boston Scientific patients would recommend SCS.1
Vertiflex™ Procedure†
This minimally invasive outpatient procedure uses a small spacer to relieve pain associated with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
Relieves chronic pain in:
- Lower back
- Legs
- Groin and buttocks
Nine out of every ten Vertiflex Procedure patients are satisfied with their relief.2,*
Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)
RFA is a minimally invasive outpatient procedure that uses thermal energy to interrupt pain signals at the source.
Relieves chronic pain in:
- Neck
- Shoulders
- Lower back
- Hips
- Knees
- Feet
of RFA patients experience lasting relief.3-5
Wondering if these solutions may be right for you?
Take this quick quiz and find out. ⟶
Why choose Boston Scientific?
Boston Scientific pain management solutions offer key advantages backed by solid clinical evidence. In particular, therapy that can be personalized to treat your unique pain may help you find relief other treatments have failed to provide.
†Superion™ Indirect Decompression System.
*Study completers.
References: 1. Thomson SJ, Kruglov D, Duarte RV. A spinal cord stimulation service review from a single centre using a single manufacturer over a 7.5 year follow-up period. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(6):589-599. N=321 2. Nunley PD, Patel VV, Orndorff DG, Lavelle WF, Block JE, Geisler FH. Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1409-1417. N=88 3. MacVicar J, Borowczyk JM, MacVicar AM, Loughnan BM, Bogduk N. Cervical medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy in New Zealand. Pain Med. 2012;13(5):647-654. 4. Dreyfuss P, Halbrook B, Pauza K, Joshi A, McLarty J, Bogduk N. Efficacy and validity of radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. Spine. 2000;25(10):1270-1277. 5. Govind J, King W, Bailey B, Bogduk N. Radiofrequency neurotomy for the treatment of third occipital headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(1):88-93.
Results from clinical studies are not predictive of results in other studies. Results in other studies may vary.